Just For Fun

30
May

2012

Beautiful Tower and Pylon Infrastructure

Design Depot's spherical lattice towers.

The tower infrastructure associated with cable transit is justifiably maligned. It’s utilitarian and rarely pretty. But it doesn’t have to be.

Last year, the Royal Institute of British Architects tackled this very issue through their Pylon Design Competition. Now granted, that competition was specifically targeted towards electricity transmission towers, but the same applies here. (Note, you can see all the short-listed design concepts here.)

Flower Tower Concept by Gustafson Porter with Atelier One and Pfisterer.

As we’ve seen with systems like Portland and London, tower infrastructure can be a piece of artistry. Towers such as those are admittedly expensive rarities but only because they’re, well, rare.

That’s simple Supply and Demand working there. Beautiful towers are rarely in demand; which leads to non-existent supply; which, in turn, leads to increased cost.

The flip side of that, of course, is that if more beautiful towers are demanded, then the cost of beautiful towers will come down. And everything I’m hearing from cities contemplating cable propelled transit systems, suggests that change is not long off.

Cities (or more exactly, politicians and policy-makers) don’t like the idea of awful-looking lattice towers cluttering up their backyards and that’s likely to drive a sea-change within the industry. If not now, then some time in the near-to-mid future. The companies that figure that out and learn how to provide pre-fabricated, yet beautiful tower infrastructure will be at a clear competitive advantage in the urban market.

Remember: Ugly is nothing more than an opportunity to be beautiful.

In the meantime, take a look at a handful of tower designs (some realized) I managed to pull from around the web and imagine how you might use them in a cable transit design of your own:

Russia's Design Depot came up with this gorgeously whimsical take on the classic lattice tower.

 

Mulhouse, France's Tramway Pylons. Image via flickr user michallon.

Iceland's Choi + Shine Architects' award-winning "Land of Giants" transmission tower concept.

Enessere's wood and steel Hercules wind turbine.

08
May

2012

Nik Wallenda – Cedar Point Skyride High Wire Cable Crossing

Last week, Canadian officials finally gave Nik Wallenda — a daredevil performer — the green light to tightrope walk across Niagara Falls. This will be the first time a stunt like this has been attempted since 1859.

My first reaction was how and where does one practice for such an endeavour?

Lo and behold, the answer involves cable cars. Here’s a video of Nik polishing his technique on the Cedar Point Sky Ride.

02
May

2012

Sex in cable cars banned in China (seriously)

The Chinese Province of Henan has put a ban on, well, the gondola equivalent of the “mile high” club following numerous complaints about such activities occurring in one specific park installation. The popularity of the activity, however, appears limited to younger generations as only people born in the 90′s have been forbidden from such mid-air extra-curricular activities – implying, of course, that the sky’s the limit for anyone else.

It’s hard to tell if this is actually a thing – as in, this is something that’s a real, actual problem that needed to be addressed; or if it’s just an-overreaction to one or two isolated incidents.

Either way, you can be certain of two things.

Firstly: People who don’t like the idea of using gondolas as transit will use this as an argument against the technology.

Secondly: Those companies that install closed-circuit cameras in gondolas are likely to see a dramatic increase in their business.

17
Apr

2012

Flashback: 1991

Thanks (we think) to Gareth for sending us perhaps the strangest gondola-related picture in the history of the site.

So my old friend Gareth sends along the photo to the left and a whole swarm of questions flash through my mind: 

a) Doesn’t my aunt have that exact same sweater?

b) What was the last Jackie Chan movie I actually saw?

c) Should men wear pants that tight in public?

d) Will fashion high tops ever come back into style?

e) How much more awesome would that photo be if Jackie Chan were holding a cigarette in his right hand?

f) 1991 couldn’t have been that long ago, could it?

 

Answers: a) Yes. b) Rumble in the Bronx. c) No. d) I hope not. e) So much more awesome. f) It was.

 

03
Apr

2012

How Not To Do “Viral” Marketing

Dear Company That Invited Me To Use Their Image “However I Like,”

The way I’d like to use the image you so kindly offered me is to discuss how not to do viral marketing and irritate the potential customers you’re so desperately trying to solicit.

Please allow me to give some background:

A couple of days ago I received an email from one of your staff (whose initials are JR) who “wanted to reach out and share a graphic that my team and I created which takes a closer look at how our daily commute is affecting our mental and physical health.”

Those were JR’s words, not mine.

If I may for a second, JR’s email skills are impeccable. She has exquisite grammar, flawless spelling and never once sounds like a Nigerian prince.

She is an emailer’s dream.

JR seemed like such good, upstanding people – and she was genuinely interested in the issue of our daily commute. When JR asked if I would be interested in “taking a look” I was dumbstruck by the opportunity.

Of course I’ll take a look! I thought. Traffic (the vehicular kind) is after all the sorta’ kinda’ business we’re in here.

I was then directed to the image to the left and was told to “to use it as (I) like!”

What a deal!

Coming up with unique and original content on a daily basis is a lot of work and suddenly here’s some generous soul offering something I could use immediately!

JR and her “team” had clearly done their research and had some interesting stats to share with the world. Why wouldn’t I share this with our readership?

But let’s not get ahead of ourselves . . .

Before taking the plunge and embedding your image in our site, I thought it prudent to bop around your site a bit to learn more about who these angels were who were oh so willing to help me in my daily grind. Even though I was confident of your generosity, my due diligence training taught to look out for offers too good to be true. Nevertheless, I was confident that you were true of heart and spirit.

“Who were these selfless traffic gurus?” I asked myself as I began to explore your site.

I was crushed to learn the answer.

It turns out JR and her team were not the insightful traffic specialists I’d hoped but were instead a bunch sleazy marketers hawking a lousy website about online universities and attending college while living at home with your parents.

And while I’ll admit to being somewhat intrigued by the offer of kibitzing with like-minded individuals about the horrors of trying to sneak one’s freshman-aged girlfriend into one’s bedroom while one’s mother’s passed out in front of late-night reruns of Family Feud, those years are well behind me. I also don’t think the content has a lot of relevance to our readership which is comprised mostly of transit geeks, planners and engineers with a specialized interest in using ski lifts as public transit.

I may be wrong about that, but I don’t think so.

Listen, just like most bloggers out there, we’re happy to provide backlinks and traffic to other sites with interesting, relevant content for our readership – that’s the way the internet works after all. What we’re not willing to do, however, is embed an image on our site that’s designed exclusively to garner said backlinks and traffic to a site that has absolutely nothing in common with our own. That just isn’t right in our opinion.

We’re also not willing to work or collaborate with people who are duplicitous, dishonest or otherwise misrepresent their intentions. Is what JR and her team did spam? Not exactly. But it’s not exactly not spam either, now is it? I’ll admit to being confused about that distinction, but do recognize that such a distinction exists. We’re sure you see the problems this raises and are hopeful that you regret confusing us in this manner.

We still, however, wish to thank you for the image. It’s very well laid-out and has some interesting points to make.

And to show you that there are no hard feelings, we’ve downloaded the image from your website and re-uploaded it to our own. We’ve worked around any of the requested embedding and have eliminated any of the backlinks it may have provided you. I’m sure you understand our actions and will agree with our opinion that, by doing this, our readership will enjoy your content much more knowing that they aren’t at risk of accidentally clicking a link and being directed to a website that has absolutely nothing in common with our own site (yours, in this case).

And just to put your mind further at ease, we recognize that this has been released under a Creative Commons license, so distributing your work in this way presents zero copyright issues from our standpoint – we’re totally protected, so don’t worry about that.

We’re also not going link to or use the name of your company because that would defeat the purpose of the understanding that we’ve reached here. We are however going to point our readership to the name of your website (which is located at the bottom of your image) without actually explicitly using the name.

In this way, they know exactly what kind of marketing techniques your site engages in and will avoid it all costs while at the same time not providing you with any of the traffic or back links you so clearly covet. We think you’ll agree that this is an appropriate thing to do given the circumstances and we hope that you’ve learned your lesson.

Lastly. We don’t want to look selfish. We know that we’re using your image and not giving you any of the things in return that you desired. We feel bad about that.

As such, we’d like to offer you some ideas of other websites you may wish to contact. We’re not sure, but these websites may have content that is just as relevant to your interests as you thought ours were to yours:

Good luck and thanks again!

Sincerely,

The Gondola Project

PS – We really hope our readers will blog, share, stumble, facebook, tweet, whatever this as much as possible.

19
Mar

2012

Spare some change? Shangqiu, Henan (China) Public Transport

Imagine if your paycheque came in the form of dollar bills. This is how it'd look like. Image by xinmin.cn.

Fare collection in transit systems have evolved dramatically in the last decades with many large agencies opting for electronic payment systems such as the Oyster Card (London) and Octopus Card (Hong Kong). However, in many places around the world, many people who are unfamiliar with this form of payment still choose to pay using regular spare change.

In the city of Shangqiu, located in China’s Henan province, staff working in the public transit agency have received their wage straight from the farebox (literally) for the past 12 years (link in Chinese)! This might be absurd (and slightly amusing) but there are two perfectly logical reasons for this: 1) While a transportation card exists, the number of users adopting this system is minimal; and 2) Local banks aren’t willing to accept that much loose change.

So the result is workers taking home a stack of bills and coins. Judging from the smile of the employee pictured above, I guess receiving a wage in dollar bills is better than not receiving a wage at all.

I'd hate to be the one responsible for sorting that out by hand. Image by xinmin.cn.

This brings several things to question: what is the farebox recovery of this transit system in Shangqiu? And are employees paid a fixed income or do their salaries fluctuate based on the amount of paying riders?

While this would obviously never happen here in North America, I can’t help but imagine what the results would be if this were to occur in the US and Canada. Better service? Poorer service? You be the judge.

29
Feb

2012

Gondola Tunes

In Aspen you can play your iPod in a gondola. Just hope none of your friends want to listen to Nickelback... Image by The Ski Channel.

Commuting to work on public transit can give you a chance to catch up on sleep , read, do work, avoid the hassle of finding parking, etc etc. However, it can also be stressful — overcrowding, lack of personal space and unfamiliarity with transit routes can all be frustrating.

But now the Silver Queen Gondola in Aspen, Colorado may offer a simple improvement by letting riders play their own music. That’s right, each cabin features an onboard MP3 dock. One reason this works is because a gondola is a small, contained vehicle. While you’d never get an entire subway train to agree to a song or even genre of music, if you were commuting with a small group of friends or acquaintances,a consensus is most likely reached.

While this add-on is no panacea to the ills of riding transit and could potentially be a source of irritation to some passengers, it does demonstrate the opportunities for personalizing travel experiences, especially with CPT technology.

Who wouldn’t want to add a little fun and enjoyment to their daily commute? Now the only problem will be deciding on who’s Ipod to use…

Thanks goes to Anna Hill for informing us of this system. 

 

 

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...