Guest Post by Jamie Clarkson.
No holiday in Chamonix, France is complete without a trip up the imposing ‘Needle of Mid-day’ on the infamous Téléphérique de L’Aiguille du Midi. When I visited Chamonix this summer, I was inclined (no pun inteded) to think the same.
I tried to ride the system on a Tuesday, but since a technical problem had caused long queues, combined with the fact that the Télécabine Panoramic du Mont Blanc gondola – which is situated at the mountain top – to Italy was closed, I decided to visit the next day. So on Wednesday, I arrived early in the morning. Fortunately, the problems on the Télépherique de L’Aiguille du Midi were now fixed, the Télécabine Panoramic Mont Blanc was reopened, and the weather was lovely. This was certainly a perfect day for riding France’s highest tourist attraction!
At first, I found the queuing system a little strange. After buying a ticket, you were supplied with a number. Once given your card you were told to wait until it was your slot – my number was 17. In the end, it turned out to be a very effective method for minimising congestion, even though the station appeared to be quite crowded. It took perhaps half an hour to reach number 17 from about number 8. This worked out well since you can simply go off and have a walk around Chamonix before coming back when it’s your turn. If you were further back in the queue (I saw one person with 64), you would possibly have enough time to ride all the other cable cars in the Arve valley! After travelling up to the intermediate station (at 2,317 metres), it was a quick turnover into one of the cars for the journey up the second section.
The second section, at 2867 metres long, is the second longest single span aerial tramway in the world. The ride takes around about ten minutes, and the views on the way up are very good (it would be hard to say incredible! or amazing! even though they were, as most of the views in the Alps tend to be so). Once at the top, two things take your breath away – the panorama, and the cold. You sort of forget, in the midst of all the sunshine and majestic mountains that it’s quite cold up at 3777 metres.
After a short walk over an amazingly high platform linking the ‘north peak’ to the ‘central peak’ there was a surprisingly small queue to buy tickets for the Télécabine Panoramic Mont-Blanc. This system effectively takes you over to Italy. Personally, I don’t see why you would want to miss it, especially after queuing for about half the morning to get up there in the first place. And plus, the price was not bad, costing only €24.40. There was only a small wait for the group of 3 gondolas to arrive (the system was a pulsed gondola); when they did, the whole system slowed down and the attendant helped everyone board. Each cabin had enough room for four people, but it was not busy and none of them were full.
The journey was incredible and filled with amazing views down to the various glaciers flowing off Mont-Blanc. There was a great feeling of remoteness, although down below there were many groups of mountaineers and some skiers on the Vallée Blanche. Around one third of the way across, the gondola went through an intermediary station on Gros Rognon. There was no getting out here: it was purely for support and to change the direction of the cables by 8°. The next section of the line crossed the Glacier du Géant, and there were good views of the various crevasses.
Nearing Italy, it became cloudy and visibility greatly decreased. Suddenly the line approached something very unusual — a suspended support pillar. This contraption involved wires being carried between the rocky outcrops of the ‘Grand and Petit Flambeau’. From this suspended line, there was a normal deflection wheel which you would generally find on a typical tower. It was needed here because the glacier was too unstable to build a normal tower. This type of support could prove useful in cities, where lines could be hung between high buildings, eliminating the need for towers.
The arrival in Italy was not exactly great as by this time the weather turned foul and unfortunately, we were not allowed to disembark, presumably to reduce queuing. On the way back over to France the weather once again became nicer and I was afforded with more wonderful views. One piece of advice I’d give to anyone going on this journey is to make sure your camera has plenty of space — I ended up taking nearly 500 photos! If necessary it would be a good idea to purchase a spare SD card.
SOME FACTS:
TÉLÉPHÉRIQUE DE L’AIGUILLE
- Aerial Tramway
- Two sections of two cabins
- Total Vertical ascent : 1,035 m to 3842 m
- Second section direct span : 2,867 m
- Total ascent time : 20 minutes
- Adult ticket : €50 there and back
- Nearby mountains : Mont Blanc, Mont Maudit, Mont Blanc du Tacul, Grands Jorrases, Aiguille du Dru,
TÉLÉCABINE PANORAMIC MONT-BLANC
- Pulsed Gondola
- 12 groups of 3 small cabins
- 5100m total span with two intermediary supports
- Longest span:2,831m with sag of 255 m but 300m ground clearance
- From 3,778m at Aiguille du Midi to 3,466 at Pointe Helbronner
6 Comments
Do you have anymore pictures of that support pillar? This device could have huge implications for urban gondolas.
I enjoyed your article very much. I undertook this journey several years ago but on the return leg took a bus through the Mont-Blanc tunnel which is an experience in itself. I can’t remember the suspended support pillar but you make a very good point about its application for urban systems. Given appropriate structures to suspend the cables from, both costs and visual impact could be considerably reduced.
Last weekend I saw a scale model of a proposed Detroit-Windsor gondola at the Windsor Science Centre (http://www.cssciencecity.com/). What was interesting was that the gondola cable was supported by a suspension bridge. So instead of the gondolas going to the top of the tower, there were aerial supports for the gondola cable in the middle of the river supported by the main suspension bridge cable. Of course the suspension bridge didn’t have a deck, just the curved suspension cables so the visual impact on the crossing was much reduced.
As a side note, outside the main entrance of the Science Centre was a full-size gondola promoting the “Skylink” proposal.
@ Sam Wong
Interesting. Last I heard of the Windsor Detroit proposal was that it was unsuccessful. This could be another attempt at reviving the project. Did you happen to take any pictures?
There doesn’t seem to be much recent news on it, however, I did find these pictures. The first is the initial conceptual designs dating way back while the second one is most likely the full size gondola model you’re referring to.
[img]http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m764ns9ErW1rz7gp1o1_1280.jpg[/img]
[img]http://farm2.staticflickr.com/1165/626951889_0873e06a9c.jpg[/img]
Your second picture is the gondola in front of their Science Center (a converted school). Definitely not an active project. Here’s an diagram of their “suspended support pillars”: http://web.archive.org/web/20041124225708/http://www.freedomgondola.com/Project%20Overview/Freedom_Gondola_Info.pdf
Its possible to find more info about the Telecabine in french http://www.remontees-mecaniques.net website .
Interesting to note that these 1950 projects , are even today not simple at all, build them when Helicopters weren’t available and all work and transport should rely on men, need some out-of-scale people, first of all, Dino Lora Totino that ideated , promoted and financed the lifts, and Denis Creissels that designed them.
@Jamie : you could not stop in Italy because the cableway from Courmayeur is being rebuilt now.