Post by Steven Dale
See, the newest incarnation of the system was built in 1995 to replace an old system that dates from the early part of the last century. The new system was to be faster with bigger cabins, and that’s where the problem arose.
The issue was two-fold:
Firstly, the existing building envelopes were too small to accommodate platforms on either side of the lower terminal. A single platform is okay if an Aerial Tram system only has one vehicle, but in the event of two vehicles, two platforms are almost always required (unless of course, the platform is located between the vehicles as demonstrated Hauser Kaibling Aerial Tram).
The Pfänderbahn was going to have two vehicles.
Secondly, the lower terminal was historically significant, thereby eliminating any possibility of dramatically expanding or changing the terminal.
So system designers got innovative.
The system was designed with a single platform that shifts back and forth mimicking the typical two-platform configuration. This would solve the space crunch while allowing riders to board and alight from both sides of the terminal. It sounds complicated to read it, but to see it is pretty straightforward:
Now admittedly, this isn’t some revolutionary technique or feature of cable transit. What it is, however, is a demonstration of how flexible the technology is when dealing with design challenges.
One thing we continually keep discovering is that the cable transit industry is positively littered with all sorts of unique features and capabilities – most of which go completely unreported. And as there’s roughly 20,000 cable systems in the world, there’s almost no way to document all this hidden features.
That should change so that this rapidly growing industry can better show-off just exactly what they can do.
Want more? Purchase Cable Car Confidential: The Essential Guide to Cable Cars, Urban Gondolas & Cable Propelled Transit and start learning about the world's fastest growing transportation technologies.